Mitigation surgical emergency practice durinf COVID-19 pandemic?

Main Article Content

Noman Zafar
Florence Kashora
Kamran Qurashi
Jasim Al-Musawi
Josef Watfah
Lampros Liasis
Manoj Sen
Stuart Gould
Carolynne J Vaizey
Janindra Warusavitarne
Cosimo Alex Leo


PURPOSE: To define the change in Emergency Surgical Unit (ESU) workload during the COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS: Patient data for a three-week period was prospectively collected for ESU patients during lockdown period and compared to the ESU workload for the same time period prior to lockdown.

RESULTS: Surgical emergencies admissions reduced by 2.5 times during our study period (p value = 0.001). In this changed paradigm, the overall number of surgical emergencies were reduced. A high mortality (n = 4, 5.7%) was noted during lockdown period as compared to pre-lockdown period (n = 1, 0.58%, p value = 0.025). Almost half of surgical admissions were tested for COVID-19 based on their symptoms and more than third (n=14, 38.9%) of them were positive. Gastrointestinal symptoms were common in COVID-19 positive group (85.7%) and only a third (36%) of COVID-19 positive patients needed surgical attention. Chest x-ray findings were comparable to PCR testing in terms of sensitivity and specificity but CT chest was more sensitive.

CONCLUSIONS: It remains unclear how COVID-19 reduced surgical emergencies. A significant proportion of COVID-19 presented with gastrointestinal symptoms. In a new outbreak all General Surgical patients should be tested with CRP and WCC used as a triage adjunct.

Article Details

How to Cite
Zafar, Noman, et al. “Mitigation Surgical Emergency Practice Durinf COVID-19 Pandemic?”. Annali Italiani Di Chirurgia, vol. 92, no. 3, May 2021, pp. 312-6,